Meeting skills
Dec. 3rd, 2004 08:20 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I should figure out how to make people stop talking in meetings I'm running. (Either "what you're saying is irrelevant" or "let someone else talk".) This occasionally is a problem in the one group I'm responsible for right now; last night could have been a disaster but worked out to be mercifully okay.
no subject
Date: 2004-12-03 06:14 am (UTC)But there are a lot of mechanistic things teachers have developed to streamline class discussion and spread it around a bit. Some of them are just not going to work ("you can only talk if you are holding the magic nerf toy", "you have n rocks and you can talk once per rock and then you are done"). But some things center on expectation-setting and might work. That is, you set up front some ground rules for the discussion (eg "I want to hear everyone's point of view, so we'll go around the table and give everyone x amount of time to state an opinion"). Then, if people are being irritating, you can refer back to the rules (see, it's not about you or them, it's a rule!). And it gives you a chance to state up front the reason behind the rule (eg you value everyone's participation). Agendas are an elaborate version of this rule ("see, the piece of paper says we have to discuss x y and z, so, while I value your input and would love to talk more with you at some future time, we simply have to keep moving").
no subject
Date: 2004-12-03 07:12 pm (UTC)So the problem is typically "move the meeting along", but it's more an irritation than a necessity. It doesn't feel like it justifies Process (TM), and that would ruin the warm-fluffiness for the rest of us.