[personal profile] dmaze
Say a positronic robot, programmed with the standard Three Laws, became aware that a human being had a skin condition -- no, better, something actually dangerous, like an ulcer -- that was aggravated by stress. Would that robot then not be compelled by the First Law to place that human in a minimum-stress, maximum-comfort environment?

Date: 2006-05-27 07:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chenoameg.livejournal.com
Yet another example of why the three laws don't work in the actual world.

Preventing suffering is too complicated.

Date: 2006-05-28 04:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] firstfrost.livejournal.com
That's kind of the premise of "With Folded Hands", I think. (They follow "To serve and obey and guard men from harm" rather than the Asimovian laws, but do take it to your further extreme.)

Oddly, I don't think I've *read* this, but it's seeped into my brain anyway.

Date: 2006-05-29 12:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nuclearpolymer.livejournal.com
Hmmm. Is it not the case that the human immune system is weakened by mental stress, and so it might be the robot's duty to "domesticate" all people, raising them all in sterile, low-stress environments?

Date: 2006-05-29 12:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nuclearpolymer.livejournal.com
Actually, sterile, low-stress, calorie-limited environments. The robot would have to destroy Krispe Kreme. But wait, that might cause stress.
Page generated Jun. 14th, 2025 08:08 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios