ext_169438 ([identity profile] 76trombones.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] dmaze 2004-12-03 08:27 am (UTC)

My own signal-to-noise ratio was certainly lower than I'd have liked it to be. There are several reasons:

1. I wasn't well prepared for the discussion (and neither were most of the other participants). I'm not sure how that could have been fixed: even if things had been ready earlier, they wouldn't have been distributed outside of a meeting. Maybe having quiet time to read each whole document, then proceeding once everyone had finished?

2. I felt that I was competing for floor time. There was a point when I said "you should discuss this... oh, wait, maybe you already did, but in a previous section... oh, uh, then I guess you should make the connection more explicit, or say it here also, or something, uh..." (etc). Now, one reason I was fumbling so badly was the lack of preparation, of course, but the reason I kept going was that I felt like I had something to say, and eventually I'd figure it out, and I'd better keep the floor, because if I didn't, I might not get it again any time soon.

3. I wasn't entirely clear on our purpose. The general idea was obvious, of course, but... well, more on that in email, not here.

#2 is just a corollary of the problem you were already wondering how to solve, but I guess it helps illustrate the self-reinforcing nature of it.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org